We were able to find that in such relations between adnominal constituents and their head nouns, adnominal constituents are classified into five types based on their interaction with the state of being of their head nouns. Firstly, adnominal constituents represent how the state of being of their head noun is. Secondly, they represent the state of being of their head nouns. Thirdly, they represent the evaluation of the state that is indicated by "N + V" structure in context. And then, they represent that the action/state of the verb is in the state indicated by the adnominal constituent. Finally, they represent how concrete instances of the referents of their head nouns are selected among the concepts of their head nouns.

Furthermore, We treat the semantic behavior of "純粋な(pure)," as an example, which modifies the state of being of the referent of the head noun. And we found that some interpretations of adverbial semantic relationships need inferences by contexts.

The frequency of exposure measured in this investigation may be understood as an important element in the degree of familiarity with and preferences for kanji variants.

We classified the relation between the antecedent context and the sore/kore sentence into the following six types, by the presence of the conjunctive expressions or the linguistic forms.

1. When the antecedent sentence is a subordinate clause.
2. When the antecedent sentence and the sore/kore sentence have the relation between cause and effect.
3. When the sore/kore denies or opposes the content of the antecedent context.
4. When in the sore/kore sentence a content is added to the antecedent contest.
5. When the antecedent context is a question.
6. When the antecedent context and the sore/kore sentence are a subject-predicate relation. When in the sore/kore sentence a new subject is introduced into the context. When there are no conjunctive expressions between the antecedent sentence and the sore/kore sentence.

1. The words tigau and dame were found to frequently co-occur with the adverb zenzen. THe words tigau and dame have two features in common. Firstly, these two words both indicate that a state is distinctly differ from an absolute standard, and if zenzen co-occur with these words, zenzen means that the distance from the standard is great. Secondly, the individual meanings of these two words aren't strong.

   The words which lack such features cannot co-occur with zenzen without certain contexts.

2. Zenzen can co-occur with affirmative predicates in the case when speakers deny hearers' opinions and also in the case that speakers wish to express that one thing is much better than something else. Especially, the younger generation accepts this usage. This usage originated from zenzen's meaning mentioned in 1.
3. The younger generation also accepts the co-occurrence of zenzen together with ii/heiki/daizyoobu when compared to the older speakers. Furthermore, they consider zenzen oisii as more acceptable than zenzen mazui. These two results mean that "zenzen + affirmative" is tending to express preferable state.

The relationship between the survey results and the social attributes of informants was analysed. The following tendencies became clear regarding politeness strategies and norm consciousness.

1. Glorified usage of the modesty expression "ageru"(to give)
   There is a high usage rate of the glorified form "ageru" (to give) in metropolitan areas and among young women, however, the usage rate is low in areas of varied honorific dialects. In area with varied honorific dialects, the rate of inappropriate usage of glorified forms is around 90 %, which is extremely high. In older age groups, who favour the Tokyo dialect, however, the rate of inappropriate usage is relatively low.
2. Norm consciousness of honorific expressions
   70 % of people in areas of varied honorific dialects answered that the act of not using honorific expressions towards hearers (face to face) "gets on their nerves". In contrast, 60 % of people in simple honorific dialectal areas answered that the speakers' act of not using honorific expressions towards hearers (face to face) "doesn't get on their nerves".

   In area with varied honorific dialects, 80~90 % of people thought it was inappropriate not to use honorific expressions towards the act of third party is, which is extremely high. Conversely, among junior high school and high school students, it was 50~70 %, which is low when compared to that of other age groups.

3. Politeness strategies when referencing the hearers' act In simple honorific dialectal areas, the rate of not using honorific expressions was twice as high as that in varied honorific dialectal areas.

   In metropolitan areas, there was a high usage rate of high-levelled honorific verbs like "nasaru" and "o ~ ninaru" forms. The rate of using correct honorific expressions was high and about to that in varied honorific dialectal areas. On the other hand however, overuse errors and the use of redundant double honorifics ("mosareru") were high as well.

   In varied honorific dialectal areas, honorific auxiliary verbs ("reru, rareru") forms were highly used. The rate of using correct honorific expression was high, equal to that in metropolitan areas. The rate of not using honorific expressions was the lowest.